FINAL Game forecast · REGULAR week 1

East CarolinaatAlabama

Sat, Sep. 5 · 12:00 PM ET · Bryant-Denny Stadium

East Carolina10
Alabama48
CALLED

SharpTake projected Alabama at 79%. Alabama won.

ProjectedAlabama by 14.5
ActualAlabama by 38
Difference23.5 pts
Market spreadAlabama -27.75
Vs spreadLOSSSharpTake Pick: East Carolina +27.75

Pregame forecast · published before kickoff and not revised

SharpTake projects Alabama to win.

AlabamaProjected winner
79%Win probability
Alabama by 14.5Projected margin

Why SharpTake leans

Why SharpTake leans Alabama

Alabama's overall quality is the biggest reason SharpTake favors Alabama. Alabama also has the edge in big-play ability and down-to-down efficiency, while East Carolina's running-game efficiency pushes the other way.

Overall team quality

Strong Alabama advantage

Big-play ability

Slight Alabama advantage

Down-to-down efficiency

Slight Alabama advantage

Running-game efficiency

East Carolina offset

On-field context

Matchup breakdown

These matchup factors describe where the teams differ on the field. They are separate from SharpTake's forecast explanation above.

Alabama run game

EDGE
Alabama offenseEast Carolina defense

Alabama gains enough yardage on runs for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle, while East Carolina allows enough yardage on runs for the down and distance far less often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors East Carolina.

Rushing Success Rate · 40.9%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Near the FBS middle
Rushing Success Rate allowed · 36.9%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Among the strongest FBS results

Comparison basis · Rushing success rate vs rushing success rate allowed

East Carolina disruption vs Alabama

EDGE
Alabama disruption allowedEast Carolina disruption created

Alabama avoids tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles at a rate near the FBS middle, while East Carolina creates tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles far more often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors East Carolina.

Havoc Rate allowed · 13.5%Havoc Rate is the share of plays with a tackle for loss, pass defended, or forced fumble.Near the FBS middle
Defensive Havoc Rate · 19.1%Havoc Rate is the share of plays with a tackle for loss, pass defended, or forced fumble.Among the strongest FBS results

Comparison basis · Havoc allowed vs havoc created

Staying on schedule

NO EDGE
Alabama offenseEast Carolina defense

Alabama gains enough yardage for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle, while East Carolina allows enough yardage for the down and distance less often than most FBS teams. The evidence does not separate the teams enough for an advantage here.

Offensive Success Rate · 43.3%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Near the FBS middle
Defensive Success Rate allowed · 37.6%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Better than most FBS teams

Comparison basis · Success rate vs success rate allowed

Explore

Go deeper

Team reads

Position rooms

East Carolina position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Alabama position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Coverage and limitations
  • Forecasts are produced only when both teams meet SharpTake's evidence requirements.
  • Player availability, injuries, weather, travel, and rest are not included.
  • Explain factors use completed 2025 team-season evidence. They describe matchup contrasts and are not causal model attribution.
  • Neither team has completed a game this season; the forecast rests on prior-season evidence.

Forecasts are model-based context, not guarantees.

Forecast model · Data cutoff Sep. 5, 2026 · 12:00 PM ET

← Back to forecast board Recent results