FINAL Game forecast · REGULAR week 2

AlabamaatKentucky

Sat, Sep. 12 · 3:30 PM ET · Kroger Field

Alabama45
Kentucky17
CALLED

SharpTake projected Alabama at 72%. Alabama won.

ProjectedAlabama by 8.5
ActualAlabama by 28
Difference19.5 pts
Market spreadAlabama -8.5
Vs spreadNO EDGESharpTake Pick: No edge

Pregame forecast · published before kickoff and not revised

SharpTake projects Alabama to win.

AlabamaProjected winner
72%Win probability
Alabama by 8.5Projected margin

Why SharpTake leans

Why SharpTake leans Alabama

Alabama's overall quality is the biggest reason SharpTake favors Alabama. Alabama also has the edge in down-to-down efficiency, while Kentucky's record from last season pushes the other way.

Overall team quality

Strong Alabama advantage

Down-to-down efficiency

Alabama advantage

Last season's results

Kentucky offset

Passing efficiency

Kentucky offset

On-field context

Matchup breakdown

These matchup factors describe where the teams differ on the field. They are separate from SharpTake's forecast explanation above.

Alabama pass game

EDGE
Alabama offenseKentucky defense

Alabama gains enough yardage on pass plays for the down and distance more often than most FBS teams, while Kentucky allows enough yardage on pass plays for the down and distance more often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Alabama.

Passing Success Rate · 45.7%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Better than most FBS teams
Passing Success Rate allowed · 44.8%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Worse than most FBS teams

Comparison basis · Passing success rate vs passing success rate allowed

Kentucky explosive plays

EDGE
Kentucky offenseAlabama defense

Kentucky creates big-play value on successful plays far less often than most FBS teams, while Alabama allows big-play value on successful plays at a rate near the FBS middle. That comparison favors Alabama.

Offensive Explosiveness · 1.139Explosiveness measures the value created on successful plays, showing how damaging the big gains are.Among the weakest FBS results
Explosiveness allowed · 1.245Explosiveness allowed measures the value opponents create on their successful plays.Near the FBS middle

Comparison basis · Explosiveness vs explosiveness allowed

Alabama disruption vs Kentucky

EDGE
Kentucky disruption allowedAlabama disruption created

Kentucky avoids tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles less often than most FBS teams, while Alabama creates tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles more often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Alabama.

Havoc Rate allowed · 17.7%Havoc Rate is the share of plays with a tackle for loss, pass defended, or forced fumble.Worse than most FBS teams
Defensive Havoc Rate · 17.7%Havoc Rate is the share of plays with a tackle for loss, pass defended, or forced fumble.Better than most FBS teams

Comparison basis · Havoc allowed vs havoc created

Explore

Go deeper

Team reads

Position rooms

Alabama position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Kentucky position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Coverage and limitations
  • Forecasts are produced only when both teams meet SharpTake's evidence requirements.
  • Player availability, injuries, weather, travel, and rest are not included.
  • Explain factors use completed 2025 team-season evidence. They describe matchup contrasts and are not causal model attribution.

Forecasts are model-based context, not guarantees.

Forecast model · Data cutoff Sep. 12, 2026 · 3:30 PM ET

← Back to forecast board Recent results