FINAL Game forecast · REGULAR week 4

South CarolinaatAlabama

Sat, Sep. 26 · 7:00 PM ET · Bryant-Denny Stadium

South Carolina18
Alabama49
CALLED

SharpTake projected Alabama at 76%. Alabama won.

ProjectedAlabama by 11.5
ActualAlabama by 31
Difference19.5 pts
Market spreadAlabama -12.5
Vs spreadLOSSSharpTake Pick: South Carolina +12.5

Pregame forecast · published before kickoff and not revised

SharpTake projects Alabama to win.

AlabamaProjected winner
76%Win probability
Alabama by 11.5Projected margin

Why SharpTake leans

Why SharpTake leans Alabama

Alabama's overall quality is the biggest reason SharpTake favors Alabama. Alabama also has the edge in down-to-down efficiency, while South Carolina's record from last season pushes the other way.

Overall team quality

Strong Alabama advantage

Last season's results

South Carolina offset

Down-to-down efficiency

Alabama advantage

Current season's results

South Carolina offset

On-field context

Matchup breakdown

These matchup factors describe where the teams differ on the field. They are separate from SharpTake's forecast explanation above.

Alabama disruption vs South Carolina

CLEAR EDGE
South Carolina disruption allowedAlabama disruption created

South Carolina avoids tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles far less often than most FBS teams, while Alabama creates tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles more often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Alabama.

Havoc Rate allowed · 19.8%Havoc Rate is the share of plays with a tackle for loss, pass defended, or forced fumble.Among the weakest FBS results
Defensive Havoc Rate · 17.7%Havoc Rate is the share of plays with a tackle for loss, pass defended, or forced fumble.Better than most FBS teams

Comparison basis · Havoc allowed vs havoc created

South Carolina staying on schedule

EDGE
South Carolina offenseAlabama defense

South Carolina gains enough yardage for the down and distance less often than most FBS teams, while Alabama allows enough yardage for the down and distance less often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Alabama.

Offensive Success Rate · 38.2%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Worse than most FBS teams
Defensive Success Rate allowed · 37.5%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Better than most FBS teams

Comparison basis · Success rate vs success rate allowed

South Carolina pass game

EDGE
South Carolina offenseAlabama defense

South Carolina gains enough yardage on pass plays for the down and distance less often than most FBS teams, while Alabama allows enough yardage on pass plays for the down and distance less often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Alabama.

Passing Success Rate · 36.6%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Worse than most FBS teams
Passing Success Rate allowed · 37.9%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Better than most FBS teams

Comparison basis · Passing success rate vs passing success rate allowed

Explore

Go deeper

Team reads

Position rooms

South Carolina position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Alabama position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Coverage and limitations
  • Forecasts are produced only when both teams meet SharpTake's evidence requirements.
  • Player availability, injuries, weather, travel, and rest are not included.
  • Explain factors use completed 2025 team-season evidence. They describe matchup contrasts and are not causal model attribution.

Forecasts are model-based context, not guarantees.

Forecast model · Data cutoff Sep. 26, 2026 · 7:00 PM ET

← Back to forecast board Recent results