FINAL Game forecast · REGULAR week 5
KentuckyatSouth Carolina
SharpTake projected South Carolina at 57%. Kentucky won.
Pregame forecast · published before kickoff and not revised
SharpTake projects South Carolina to win.
Why SharpTake leans
Why SharpTake leans South Carolina
South Carolina's current season's results is the biggest reason SharpTake favors South Carolina. South Carolina also has the edge in record from last season, while Kentucky's overall quality pushes the other way.
Current season's results
Last season's results
Down-to-down efficiency
On-field context
Matchup breakdown
These matchup factors describe where the teams differ on the field. They are separate from SharpTake's forecast explanation above.
Kentucky explosive plays
CLEAR EDGEKentucky creates big-play value on successful plays far less often than most FBS teams, while South Carolina allows big-play value on successful plays less often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors South Carolina.
Comparison basis · Explosiveness vs explosiveness allowed
Kentucky disruption vs South Carolina
EDGESouth Carolina avoids tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles far less often than most FBS teams, while Kentucky creates tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles at a rate near the FBS middle. That comparison favors Kentucky.
Comparison basis · Havoc allowed vs havoc created
South Carolina finishing drives
EDGESouth Carolina scores points after possessions cross the opponent's 40-yard line far less often than most FBS teams, while Kentucky allows points after possessions cross the opponent's 40-yard line at a rate near the FBS middle. That comparison favors Kentucky.
Comparison basis · Points per scoring opportunity, for and allowed
Season aggregates only. How a specific opponent forces field position and drive length is not captured here.
Explore
Go deeper
Team reads
Position rooms
Coverage and limitations
- Forecasts are produced only when both teams meet SharpTake's evidence requirements.
- Player availability, injuries, weather, travel, and rest are not included.
- Explain factors use completed 2025 team-season evidence. They describe matchup contrasts and are not causal model attribution.
Forecasts are model-based context, not guarantees.