FINAL Game forecast · REGULAR week 2

UCFatPittsburgh

Sat, Sep. 12 · 3:30 PM ET · Acrisure Stadium

UCF7
Pittsburgh12
CALLED

SharpTake projected Pittsburgh at 67%. Pittsburgh won.

ProjectedPittsburgh by 7.5
ActualPittsburgh by 5
Difference2.5 pts
Market spreadPittsburgh -7
Vs spreadLOSSSharpTake Pick: Pittsburgh -7

Pregame forecast · published before kickoff and not revised

SharpTake projects Pittsburgh to win.

PittsburghProjected winner
67%Win probability
Pittsburgh by 7.5Projected margin

Why SharpTake leans

Why SharpTake leans Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh's overall quality is the biggest reason SharpTake favors Pittsburgh. Pittsburgh also has the edge in down-to-down efficiency, while UCF's current season's scoring performance pushes the other way.

Overall team quality

Strong Pittsburgh advantage

Down-to-down efficiency

Pittsburgh advantage

Current season's scoring performance

UCF offset

Big-play ability

UCF offset

On-field context

Matchup breakdown

These matchup factors describe where the teams differ on the field. They are separate from SharpTake's forecast explanation above.

UCF explosive plays

CLEAR EDGE
UCF offensePittsburgh defense

UCF creates big-play value on successful plays far more often than most FBS teams, while Pittsburgh allows big-play value on successful plays more often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors UCF.

Offensive Explosiveness · 1.368Explosiveness measures the value created on successful plays, showing how damaging the big gains are.Among the strongest FBS results
Explosiveness allowed · 1.330Explosiveness allowed measures the value opponents create on their successful plays.Worse than most FBS teams

Comparison basis · Explosiveness vs explosiveness allowed

Pittsburgh disruption vs UCF

CLEAR EDGE
UCF disruption allowedPittsburgh disruption created

UCF avoids tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles less often than most FBS teams, while Pittsburgh creates tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles far more often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Pittsburgh.

Havoc Rate allowed · 17.3%Havoc Rate is the share of plays with a tackle for loss, pass defended, or forced fumble.Worse than most FBS teams
Defensive Havoc Rate · 18.9%Havoc Rate is the share of plays with a tackle for loss, pass defended, or forced fumble.Among the strongest FBS results

Comparison basis · Havoc allowed vs havoc created

UCF staying on schedule

EDGE
UCF offensePittsburgh defense

UCF gains enough yardage for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle, while Pittsburgh allows enough yardage for the down and distance far less often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Pittsburgh.

Offensive Success Rate · 39.9%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Near the FBS middle
Defensive Success Rate allowed · 35.6%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Among the strongest FBS results

Comparison basis · Success rate vs success rate allowed

Explore

Go deeper

Team reads

Position rooms

UCF position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Pittsburgh position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Coverage and limitations
  • Forecasts are produced only when both teams meet SharpTake's evidence requirements.
  • Player availability, injuries, weather, travel, and rest are not included.
  • Explain factors use completed 2025 team-season evidence. They describe matchup contrasts and are not causal model attribution.

Forecasts are model-based context, not guarantees.

Forecast model · Data cutoff Sep. 12, 2026 · 3:30 PM ET

← Back to forecast board Recent results