FINAL Game forecast · REGULAR week 1

MiamiatStanford

Fri, Sep. 4 · 9:00 PM ET · Stanford Stadium

Miami45
Stanford6
CALLED

SharpTake projected Miami at 95%. Miami won.

ProjectedMiami by 28.5
ActualMiami by 39
Difference10.5 pts
Market spreadMiami -24.5
Vs spreadWINSharpTake Pick: Miami -24.5

Pregame forecast · published before kickoff and not revised

SharpTake projects Miami to win.

MiamiProjected winner
95%Win probability
Miami by 28.5Projected margin

Why SharpTake leans

Why SharpTake leans Miami

Miami's overall quality is the biggest reason SharpTake favors Miami. Miami also has the edge in down-to-down efficiency and running-game efficiency, while Stanford's record from last season pushes the other way.

Overall team quality

Strong Miami advantage

Down-to-down efficiency

Strong Miami advantage

Last season's results

Stanford offset

Running-game efficiency

Miami advantage

On-field context

Matchup breakdown

These matchup factors describe where the teams differ on the field. They are separate from SharpTake's forecast explanation above.

Stanford staying on schedule

CLEAR EDGE
Stanford offenseMiami defense

Stanford gains enough yardage for the down and distance far less often than most FBS teams, while Miami allows enough yardage for the down and distance far less often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Miami.

Offensive Success Rate · 36.5%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Among the weakest FBS results
Defensive Success Rate allowed · 35.9%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Among the strongest FBS results

Comparison basis · Success rate vs success rate allowed

Stanford run game

CLEAR EDGE
Stanford offenseMiami defense

Stanford gains enough yardage on runs for the down and distance far less often than most FBS teams, while Miami allows enough yardage on runs for the down and distance far less often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Miami.

Rushing Success Rate · 37.5%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Among the weakest FBS results
Rushing Success Rate allowed · 35.3%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Among the strongest FBS results

Comparison basis · Rushing success rate vs rushing success rate allowed

Miami disruption vs Stanford

CLEAR EDGE
Stanford disruption allowedMiami disruption created

Stanford avoids tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles less often than most FBS teams, while Miami creates tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles far more often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Miami.

Havoc Rate allowed · 17.2%Havoc Rate is the share of plays with a tackle for loss, pass defended, or forced fumble.Worse than most FBS teams
Defensive Havoc Rate · 18.9%Havoc Rate is the share of plays with a tackle for loss, pass defended, or forced fumble.Among the strongest FBS results

Comparison basis · Havoc allowed vs havoc created

Explore

Go deeper

Team reads

Position rooms

Miami position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Stanford position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Coverage and limitations
  • Forecasts are produced only when both teams meet SharpTake's evidence requirements.
  • Player availability, injuries, weather, travel, and rest are not included.
  • Explain factors use completed 2025 team-season evidence. They describe matchup contrasts and are not causal model attribution.
  • Neither team has completed a game this season; the forecast rests on prior-season evidence.

Forecasts are model-based context, not guarantees.

Forecast model · Data cutoff Sep. 4, 2026 · 9:00 PM ET

← Back to forecast board Recent results