FINAL Game forecast · REGULAR week 5
LouisvilleatNC State
SharpTake projected Louisville at 52%. NC State won.
Pregame forecast · published before kickoff and not revised
SharpTake projects Louisville to win.
Why SharpTake leans
Why SharpTake leans Louisville
Louisville's overall quality is the biggest reason SharpTake favors Louisville. Louisville also has the edge in down-to-down efficiency and big-play ability, while NC State's record from last season pushes the other way.
Down-to-down efficiency
Last season's results
Big-play ability
On-field context
Matchup breakdown
These matchup factors describe where the teams differ on the field. They are separate from SharpTake's forecast explanation above.
Louisville run game
EDGELouisville gains enough yardage on runs for the down and distance far more often than most FBS teams, while NC State allows enough yardage on runs for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle. That comparison favors Louisville.
Comparison basis · Rushing success rate vs rushing success rate allowed
NC State finishing drives
EDGENC State scores points after possessions cross the opponent's 40-yard line far more often than most FBS teams, while Louisville allows points after possessions cross the opponent's 40-yard line at a rate near the FBS middle. That comparison favors NC State.
Comparison basis · Points per scoring opportunity, for and allowed
Season aggregates only. How a specific opponent forces field position and drive length is not captured here.
Staying on schedule
NO EDGENC State gains enough yardage for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle, while Louisville allows enough yardage for the down and distance less often than most FBS teams. The evidence does not separate the teams enough for an advantage here.
Comparison basis · Success rate vs success rate allowed
Explore
Go deeper
Team reads
Position rooms
Coverage and limitations
- Forecasts are produced only when both teams meet SharpTake's evidence requirements.
- Player availability, injuries, weather, travel, and rest are not included.
- Explain factors use completed 2025 team-season evidence. They describe matchup contrasts and are not causal model attribution.
Forecasts are model-based context, not guarantees.