FINAL Game forecast · REGULAR week 6
Florida StateatLouisville
SharpTake projected Louisville at 65%. Louisville won.
Pregame forecast · published before kickoff and not revised
SharpTake projects Louisville to win.
Why SharpTake leans
Why SharpTake leans Louisville
Louisville's overall quality is the biggest reason SharpTake favors Louisville. Louisville also has the edge in down-to-down efficiency and current season's results, while Florida State's record from last season pushes the other way.
Last season's results
Down-to-down efficiency
Current season's results
On-field context
Matchup breakdown
These matchup factors describe where the teams differ on the field. They are separate from SharpTake's forecast explanation above.
Louisville run game
EDGELouisville gains enough yardage on runs for the down and distance far more often than most FBS teams, while Florida State allows enough yardage on runs for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle. That comparison favors Louisville.
Comparison basis · Rushing success rate vs rushing success rate allowed
Louisville explosive plays
EDGELouisville creates big-play value on successful plays less often than most FBS teams, while Florida State allows big-play value on successful plays less often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Florida State.
Comparison basis · Explosiveness vs explosiveness allowed
Pass game
NO EDGEFlorida State gains enough yardage on pass plays for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle, while Louisville allows enough yardage on pass plays for the down and distance less often than most FBS teams. The evidence does not separate the teams enough for an advantage here.
Comparison basis · Passing success rate vs passing success rate allowed
Explore
Go deeper
Team reads
Position rooms
Coverage and limitations
- Forecasts are produced only when both teams meet SharpTake's evidence requirements.
- Player availability, injuries, weather, travel, and rest are not included.
- Explain factors use completed 2025 team-season evidence. They describe matchup contrasts and are not causal model attribution.
Forecasts are model-based context, not guarantees.