FINAL Game forecast · REGULAR week 1

ToledoatMichigan State

Fri, Sep. 4 · 8:00 PM ET · Spartan Stadium

Toledo20
Michigan State30
MISSED

SharpTake projected Toledo at 73%. Michigan State won.

ProjectedToledo by 8.5
ActualMichigan State by 10
Difference18.5 pts
Market spreadMichigan State -10
Vs spreadPUSHSharpTake Pick: Toledo +10

Pregame forecast · published before kickoff and not revised

SharpTake projects Toledo to win.

ToledoProjected winner
73%Win probability
Toledo by 8.5Projected margin

Why SharpTake leans

Why SharpTake leans Toledo

Toledo's overall quality is the biggest reason SharpTake favors Toledo. Toledo also has the edge in down-to-down efficiency, while Michigan State's record from last season pushes the other way.

Overall team quality

Strong Toledo advantage

Down-to-down efficiency

Strong Toledo advantage

Last season's results

Michigan State offset

Passing efficiency

Michigan State offset

On-field context

Matchup breakdown

These matchup factors describe where the teams differ on the field. They are separate from SharpTake's forecast explanation above.

Toledo disruption vs Michigan State

CLEAR EDGE
Michigan State disruption allowedToledo disruption created

Michigan State avoids tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles less often than most FBS teams, while Toledo creates tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles far more often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Toledo.

Havoc Rate allowed · 18.0%Havoc Rate is the share of plays with a tackle for loss, pass defended, or forced fumble.Worse than most FBS teams
Defensive Havoc Rate · 20.2%Havoc Rate is the share of plays with a tackle for loss, pass defended, or forced fumble.Among the strongest FBS results

Comparison basis · Havoc allowed vs havoc created

Michigan State staying on schedule

EDGE
Michigan State offenseToledo defense

Michigan State gains enough yardage for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle, while Toledo allows enough yardage for the down and distance far less often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Toledo.

Offensive Success Rate · 42.1%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Near the FBS middle
Defensive Success Rate allowed · 33.1%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Among the strongest FBS results

Comparison basis · Success rate vs success rate allowed

Michigan State pass game

EDGE
Michigan State offenseToledo defense

Michigan State gains enough yardage on pass plays for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle, while Toledo allows enough yardage on pass plays for the down and distance far less often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Toledo.

Passing Success Rate · 42.0%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Near the FBS middle
Passing Success Rate allowed · 28.3%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Among the strongest FBS results

Comparison basis · Passing success rate vs passing success rate allowed

Explore

Go deeper

Team reads

Position rooms

Toledo position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Michigan State position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Coverage and limitations
  • Forecasts are produced only when both teams meet SharpTake's evidence requirements.
  • Player availability, injuries, weather, travel, and rest are not included.
  • Explain factors use completed 2025 team-season evidence. They describe matchup contrasts and are not causal model attribution.
  • Neither team has completed a game this season; the forecast rests on prior-season evidence.

Forecasts are model-based context, not guarantees.

Forecast model · Data cutoff Sep. 4, 2026 · 8:00 PM ET

← Back to forecast board Recent results