FINAL Game forecast · REGULAR week 1

MarshallatPenn State

Sat, Sep. 5 · 3:30 PM ET · Beaver Stadium

Marshall0
Penn State45
CALLED

SharpTake projected Penn State at 85%. Penn State won.

ProjectedPenn State by 18.0
ActualPenn State by 45
Difference27.0 pts
Market spreadPenn State -23.25
Vs spreadLOSSSharpTake Pick: Marshall +23.25

Pregame forecast · published before kickoff and not revised

SharpTake projects Penn State to win.

Penn StateProjected winner
85%Win probability
Penn State by 18.0Projected margin

Why SharpTake leans

Why SharpTake leans Penn State

Penn State's overall quality is the biggest reason SharpTake favors Penn State. Penn State also has the edge in big-play ability and down-to-down efficiency, while Marshall's record from last season pushes the other way.

Overall team quality

Strong Penn State advantage

Big-play ability

Penn State advantage

Down-to-down efficiency

Slight Penn State advantage

Last season's results

Marshall offset

On-field context

Matchup breakdown

These matchup factors describe where the teams differ on the field. They are separate from SharpTake's forecast explanation above.

Marshall explosive plays

CLEAR EDGE
Marshall offensePenn State defense

Marshall creates big-play value on successful plays far less often than most FBS teams, while Penn State allows big-play value on successful plays less often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Penn State.

Offensive Explosiveness · 1.134Explosiveness measures the value created on successful plays, showing how damaging the big gains are.Among the weakest FBS results
Explosiveness allowed · 1.185Explosiveness allowed measures the value opponents create on their successful plays.Better than most FBS teams

Comparison basis · Explosiveness vs explosiveness allowed

Staying on schedule

NO EDGE
Penn State offenseMarshall defense

Penn State gains enough yardage for the down and distance more often than most FBS teams, while Marshall allows enough yardage for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle. The evidence does not separate the teams enough for an advantage here.

Offensive Success Rate · 46.2%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Better than most FBS teams
Defensive Success Rate allowed · 38.6%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Near the FBS middle

Comparison basis · Success rate vs success rate allowed

Run game

NO EDGE
Penn State offenseMarshall defense

Penn State gains enough yardage on runs for the down and distance more often than most FBS teams, while Marshall allows enough yardage on runs for the down and distance far less often than most FBS teams. The evidence does not separate the teams enough for an advantage here.

Rushing Success Rate · 47.6%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Better than most FBS teams
Rushing Success Rate allowed · 36.1%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Among the strongest FBS results

Comparison basis · Rushing success rate vs rushing success rate allowed

Explore

Go deeper

Team reads

Position rooms

Marshall position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Penn State position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Coverage and limitations
  • Forecasts are produced only when both teams meet SharpTake's evidence requirements.
  • Player availability, injuries, weather, travel, and rest are not included.
  • Explain factors use completed 2025 team-season evidence. They describe matchup contrasts and are not causal model attribution.
  • Neither team has completed a game this season; the forecast rests on prior-season evidence.

Forecasts are model-based context, not guarantees.

Forecast model · Data cutoff Sep. 5, 2026 · 3:30 PM ET

← Back to forecast board Recent results