Game forecast · REGULAR week 3

UTEPatMichigan

Sat, Sep. 19 · 3:30 PM ET · Michigan Stadium

SharpTake projects Michigan to win.

MichiganProjected winner
88%Win probability
Michigan by 19.5Projected margin
Market SpreadMarket Spread not available yet

Why SharpTake leans

Why SharpTake leans Michigan

Michigan's overall quality is the biggest reason SharpTake favors Michigan. Michigan also has the edge in down-to-down efficiency, while UTEP's record from last season pushes the other way.

Overall team quality

Strong Michigan advantage

Last season's results

UTEP offset

Current season's results

UTEP offset

Down-to-down efficiency

Michigan advantage

On-field context

Matchup breakdown

These matchup factors describe where the teams differ on the field. They are separate from SharpTake's forecast explanation above.

UTEP staying on schedule

EDGE
UTEP offenseMichigan defense

UTEP gains enough yardage for the down and distance far less often than most FBS teams, while Michigan allows enough yardage for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle. That comparison favors Michigan.

Offensive Success Rate · 32.8%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Among the weakest FBS results
Defensive Success Rate allowed · 41.8%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Near the FBS middle

Comparison basis · Success rate vs success rate allowed

UTEP run game

EDGE
UTEP offenseMichigan defense

UTEP gains enough yardage on runs for the down and distance far less often than most FBS teams, while Michigan allows enough yardage on runs for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle. That comparison favors Michigan.

Rushing Success Rate · 35.6%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Among the weakest FBS results
Rushing Success Rate allowed · 40.3%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Near the FBS middle

Comparison basis · Rushing success rate vs rushing success rate allowed

Michigan explosive plays

EDGE
Michigan offenseUTEP defense

Michigan creates big-play value on successful plays far less often than most FBS teams, while UTEP allows big-play value on successful plays at a rate near the FBS middle. That comparison favors UTEP.

Offensive Explosiveness · 1.135Explosiveness measures the value created on successful plays, showing how damaging the big gains are.Among the weakest FBS results
Explosiveness allowed · 1.213Explosiveness allowed measures the value opponents create on their successful plays.Near the FBS middle

Comparison basis · Explosiveness vs explosiveness allowed

Explore

Go deeper

Team reads

Position rooms

UTEP position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Michigan position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Coverage and limitations
  • Forecasts are produced only when both teams meet SharpTake's evidence requirements.
  • Player availability, injuries, weather, travel, and rest are not included.
  • Explain factors use completed 2025 team-season evidence. They describe matchup contrasts and are not causal model attribution.

Forecasts are model-based context, not guarantees.

Forecast model · Data cutoff Sep. 19, 2026 · 3:30 PM ET

← Back to forecast board