FINAL Game forecast · REGULAR week 4

IowaatMichigan

Sat, Sep. 26 · 3:30 PM ET · Michigan Stadium

Iowa20
Michigan19
CALLED

SharpTake projected Iowa at 57%. Iowa won.

ProjectedIowa by 3.0
ActualIowa by 1
Difference2.0 pts
Market spreadMichigan -5.25
Vs spreadWINSharpTake Pick: Iowa +5.25

Pregame forecast · published before kickoff and not revised

SharpTake projects Iowa to win.

IowaProjected winner
57%Win probability
Iowa by 3.0Projected margin

Why SharpTake leans

Why SharpTake leans Iowa

Iowa's overall quality is the biggest reason SharpTake favors Iowa. Iowa also has the edge in down-to-down efficiency and current season's scoring performance.

Overall team quality

Iowa advantage

Down-to-down efficiency

Iowa advantage

Current season's scoring performance

Iowa advantage

Recent scoring performance

Slight Iowa advantage

On-field context

Matchup breakdown

These matchup factors describe where the teams differ on the field. They are separate from SharpTake's forecast explanation above.

Michigan explosive plays

CLEAR EDGE
Michigan offenseIowa defense

Michigan creates big-play value on successful plays far less often than most FBS teams, while Iowa allows big-play value on successful plays far less often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Iowa.

Offensive Explosiveness · 1.128Explosiveness measures the value created on successful plays, showing how damaging the big gains are.Among the weakest FBS results
Explosiveness allowed · 1.076Explosiveness allowed measures the value opponents create on their successful plays.Among the strongest FBS results

Comparison basis · Explosiveness vs explosiveness allowed

Michigan run game

EDGE
Michigan offenseIowa defense

Michigan gains enough yardage on runs for the down and distance far more often than most FBS teams, while Iowa allows enough yardage on runs for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle. That comparison favors Michigan.

Rushing Success Rate · 50.1%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Among the strongest FBS results
Rushing Success Rate allowed · 41.1%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Near the FBS middle

Comparison basis · Rushing success rate vs rushing success rate allowed

Iowa disruption vs Michigan

EDGE
Michigan disruption allowedIowa disruption created

Michigan avoids tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles far more often than most FBS teams, while Iowa creates tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles at a rate near the FBS middle. That comparison favors Michigan.

Havoc Rate allowed · 12.1%Havoc Rate is the share of plays with a tackle for loss, pass defended, or forced fumble.Among the strongest FBS results
Defensive Havoc Rate · 16.9%Havoc Rate is the share of plays with a tackle for loss, pass defended, or forced fumble.Near the FBS middle

Comparison basis · Havoc allowed vs havoc created

Explore

Go deeper

Team reads

Position rooms

Iowa position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Michigan position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Coverage and limitations
  • Forecasts are produced only when both teams meet SharpTake's evidence requirements.
  • Player availability, injuries, weather, travel, and rest are not included.
  • Explain factors use completed 2025 team-season evidence. They describe matchup contrasts and are not causal model attribution.

Forecasts are model-based context, not guarantees.

Forecast model · Data cutoff Sep. 26, 2026 · 3:30 PM ET

← Back to forecast board Recent results