FINAL Game forecast · REGULAR week 5

MarylandatNebraska

Sat, Oct. 3 · 4:00 PM ET · Memorial Stadium (Lincoln, NE)

Maryland23
Nebraska48
CALLED

SharpTake projected Nebraska at 85%. Nebraska won.

ProjectedNebraska by 16.0
ActualNebraska by 25
Difference9.0 pts
Market spreadNebraska -15
Vs spreadWINSharpTake Pick: Nebraska -15

Pregame forecast · published before kickoff and not revised

SharpTake projects Nebraska to win.

NebraskaProjected winner
85%Win probability
Nebraska by 16.0Projected margin

Why SharpTake leans

Why SharpTake leans Nebraska

Nebraska's overall quality is the biggest reason SharpTake favors Nebraska. Nebraska also has the edge in recent scoring performance and down-to-down efficiency, while Maryland's current season's results pushes the other way.

Overall team quality

Strong Nebraska advantage

Current season's results

Maryland offset

Recent scoring performance

Nebraska advantage

Down-to-down efficiency

Nebraska advantage

On-field context

Matchup breakdown

These matchup factors describe where the teams differ on the field. They are separate from SharpTake's forecast explanation above.

Nebraska explosive plays

EDGE
Nebraska offenseMaryland defense

Nebraska creates big-play value on successful plays far less often than most FBS teams, while Maryland allows big-play value on successful plays at a rate near the FBS middle. That comparison favors Maryland.

Offensive Explosiveness · 1.108Explosiveness measures the value created on successful plays, showing how damaging the big gains are.Among the weakest FBS results
Explosiveness allowed · 1.202Explosiveness allowed measures the value opponents create on their successful plays.Near the FBS middle

Comparison basis · Explosiveness vs explosiveness allowed

Maryland disruption vs Nebraska

EDGE
Nebraska disruption allowedMaryland disruption created

Nebraska avoids tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles more often than most FBS teams, while Maryland creates tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles less often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Nebraska.

Havoc Rate allowed · 12.9%Havoc Rate is the share of plays with a tackle for loss, pass defended, or forced fumble.Better than most FBS teams
Defensive Havoc Rate · 14.1%Havoc Rate is the share of plays with a tackle for loss, pass defended, or forced fumble.Worse than most FBS teams

Comparison basis · Havoc allowed vs havoc created

Maryland finishing drives

EDGE
Maryland offenseNebraska defense

Maryland scores points after possessions cross the opponent's 40-yard line at a rate near the FBS middle, while Nebraska allows points after possessions cross the opponent's 40-yard line far more often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Maryland.

Points per scoring opportunity · 3.39 pointsFinishing drives measures points per possession that reaches the opponent's 40-yard line.Near the FBS middle
Points allowed per scoring opportunity · 4.37 pointsFinishing drives measures points allowed per possession that reaches the defense's 40-yard line.Among the weakest FBS results

Comparison basis · Points per scoring opportunity, for and allowed

Season aggregates only. How a specific opponent forces field position and drive length is not captured here.

Explore

Go deeper

Team reads

Position rooms

Maryland position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Nebraska position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Coverage and limitations
  • Forecasts are produced only when both teams meet SharpTake's evidence requirements.
  • Player availability, injuries, weather, travel, and rest are not included.
  • Explain factors use completed 2025 team-season evidence. They describe matchup contrasts and are not causal model attribution.

Forecasts are model-based context, not guarantees.

Forecast model · Data cutoff Oct. 3, 2026 · 4:00 PM ET

← Back to forecast board Recent results