FINAL Game forecast · REGULAR week 8

Michigan StateatUCLA

Sat, Oct. 24 · 3:30 PM ET · Rose Bowl

Michigan State10
UCLA28
CALLED

SharpTake projected UCLA at 87%. UCLA won.

ProjectedUCLA by 18.0
ActualUCLA by 18
Difference0.0 pts
Market spreadUCLA -16.5
Vs spreadWINSharpTake Pick: UCLA -16.5

Pregame forecast · published before kickoff and not revised

SharpTake projects UCLA to win.

UCLAProjected winner
87%Win probability
UCLA by 18.0Projected margin

On-field context

Matchup breakdown

These matchup factors describe where the teams differ on the field. They are separate from SharpTake's forecast explanation above.

Michigan State staying on schedule

EDGE
Michigan State offenseUCLA defense

Michigan State gains enough yardage for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle, while UCLA allows enough yardage for the down and distance far more often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Michigan State.

Offensive Success Rate · 42.3%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Near the FBS middle
Defensive Success Rate allowed · 49.8%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Among the weakest FBS results

Comparison basis · Success rate vs success rate allowed

UCLA run game

EDGE
UCLA offenseMichigan State defense

UCLA gains enough yardage on runs for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle, while Michigan State allows enough yardage on runs for the down and distance far more often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors UCLA.

Rushing Success Rate · 43.4%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Near the FBS middle
Rushing Success Rate allowed · 47.2%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Among the weakest FBS results

Comparison basis · Rushing success rate vs rushing success rate allowed

Michigan State pass game

EDGE
Michigan State offenseUCLA defense

Michigan State gains enough yardage on pass plays for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle, while UCLA allows enough yardage on pass plays for the down and distance far more often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Michigan State.

Passing Success Rate · 42.5%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Near the FBS middle
Passing Success Rate allowed · 47.6%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Among the weakest FBS results

Comparison basis · Passing success rate vs passing success rate allowed

Explore

Go deeper

Team reads

Position rooms

Michigan State position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
UCLA position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Coverage and limitations
  • Forecasts are produced only when both teams meet SharpTake's evidence requirements.
  • Player availability, injuries, weather, travel, and rest are not included.
  • Explain factors use completed 2025 team-season evidence. They describe matchup contrasts and are not causal model attribution.

Forecasts are model-based context, not guarantees.

Forecast model · Data cutoff Oct. 24, 2026 · 7:58 AM ET

← Back to forecast board Recent results