FINAL Game forecast · REGULAR week 4
Hawai‘iatWyoming
SharpTake projected Wyoming at 53%. Wyoming won.
Pregame forecast · published before kickoff and not revised
SharpTake projects Wyoming to win.
Why SharpTake leans
Why SharpTake leans Wyoming
Wyoming's record from last season is the biggest reason SharpTake favors Wyoming. Wyoming also has the edge in down-to-down efficiency and running-game efficiency, while Hawai'i's overall quality pushes the other way.
Last season's results
Down-to-down efficiency
Running-game efficiency
On-field context
Matchup breakdown
These matchup factors describe where the teams differ on the field. They are separate from SharpTake's forecast explanation above.
Hawai'i disruption vs Wyoming
EDGEWyoming avoids tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles far less often than most FBS teams, while Hawai‘i creates tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles at a rate near the FBS middle. That comparison favors Hawai‘i.
Comparison basis · Havoc allowed vs havoc created
Wyoming finishing drives
EDGEWyoming scores points after possessions cross the opponent's 40-yard line far less often than most FBS teams, while Hawai‘i allows points after possessions cross the opponent's 40-yard line at a rate near the FBS middle. That comparison favors Hawai‘i.
Comparison basis · Points per scoring opportunity, for and allowed
Season aggregates only. How a specific opponent forces field position and drive length is not captured here.
Staying on schedule
NO EDGEWyoming gains enough yardage for the down and distance less often than most FBS teams, while Hawai‘i allows enough yardage for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle. The evidence does not separate the teams enough for an advantage here.
Comparison basis · Success rate vs success rate allowed
Explore
Go deeper
Team reads
Position rooms
Coverage and limitations
- Forecasts are produced only when both teams meet SharpTake's evidence requirements.
- Player availability, injuries, weather, travel, and rest are not included.
- Explain factors use completed 2025 team-season evidence. They describe matchup contrasts and are not causal model attribution.
Forecasts are model-based context, not guarantees.