FINAL Game forecast · REGULAR week 5

UTEPatNew Mexico

Sat, Oct. 3 · 4:00 PM ET · University Stadium (NM)

UTEP7
New Mexico61
CALLED

SharpTake projected New Mexico at 92%. New Mexico won.

ProjectedNew Mexico by 23.0
ActualNew Mexico by 54
Difference31.0 pts
Market spreadNew Mexico -23.25
Vs spreadLOSSSharpTake Pick: UTEP +23.25

Pregame forecast · published before kickoff and not revised

SharpTake projects New Mexico to win.

New MexicoProjected winner
92%Win probability
New Mexico by 23.0Projected margin

Why SharpTake leans

Why SharpTake leans New Mexico

New Mexico's overall quality is the biggest reason SharpTake favors New Mexico. New Mexico also has the edge in down-to-down efficiency and current season's scoring performance, while UTEP's record from last season pushes the other way.

Overall team quality

Strong New Mexico advantage

Last season's results

UTEP offset

Down-to-down efficiency

New Mexico advantage

Current season's scoring performance

New Mexico advantage

On-field context

Matchup breakdown

These matchup factors describe where the teams differ on the field. They are separate from SharpTake's forecast explanation above.

UTEP run game

CLEAR EDGE
UTEP offenseNew Mexico defense

UTEP gains enough yardage on runs for the down and distance far less often than most FBS teams, while New Mexico allows enough yardage on runs for the down and distance less often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors New Mexico.

Rushing Success Rate · 35.6%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Among the weakest FBS results
Rushing Success Rate allowed · 38.8%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Better than most FBS teams

Comparison basis · Rushing success rate vs rushing success rate allowed

New Mexico disruption vs UTEP

CLEAR EDGE
UTEP disruption allowedNew Mexico disruption created

UTEP avoids tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles far less often than most FBS teams, while New Mexico creates tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles more often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors New Mexico.

Havoc Rate allowed · 18.6%Havoc Rate is the share of plays with a tackle for loss, pass defended, or forced fumble.Among the weakest FBS results
Defensive Havoc Rate · 17.7%Havoc Rate is the share of plays with a tackle for loss, pass defended, or forced fumble.Better than most FBS teams

Comparison basis · Havoc allowed vs havoc created

UTEP staying on schedule

EDGE
UTEP offenseNew Mexico defense

UTEP gains enough yardage for the down and distance far less often than most FBS teams, while New Mexico allows enough yardage for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle. That comparison favors New Mexico.

Offensive Success Rate · 32.9%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Among the weakest FBS results
Defensive Success Rate allowed · 39.3%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Near the FBS middle

Comparison basis · Success rate vs success rate allowed

Explore

Go deeper

Team reads

Position rooms

UTEP position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
New Mexico position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Coverage and limitations
  • Forecasts are produced only when both teams meet SharpTake's evidence requirements.
  • Player availability, injuries, weather, travel, and rest are not included.
  • Explain factors use completed 2025 team-season evidence. They describe matchup contrasts and are not causal model attribution.

Forecasts are model-based context, not guarantees.

Forecast model · Data cutoff Oct. 3, 2026 · 4:00 PM ET

← Back to forecast board Recent results