FINAL Game forecast · REGULAR week 2

South AlabamaatTulane

Sat, Sep. 12 · 7:00 PM ET · Yulman Stadium

South Alabama24
Tulane28
CALLED

SharpTake projected Tulane at 71%. Tulane won.

ProjectedTulane by 11.0
ActualTulane by 4
Difference7.0 pts
Market spreadTulane -9.75
Vs spreadLOSSSharpTake Pick: Tulane -9.75

Pregame forecast · published before kickoff and not revised

SharpTake projects Tulane to win.

TulaneProjected winner
71%Win probability
Tulane by 11.0Projected margin

Why SharpTake leans

Why SharpTake leans Tulane

Tulane's overall quality is the biggest reason SharpTake favors Tulane. Tulane also has the edge in current season's results, while South Alabama's record from last season pushes the other way.

Overall team quality

Strong Tulane advantage

Current season's results

Strong Tulane advantage

Last season's results

South Alabama offset

Current season's scoring performance

South Alabama offset

On-field context

Matchup breakdown

These matchup factors describe where the teams differ on the field. They are separate from SharpTake's forecast explanation above.

Tulane pass game

EDGE
Tulane offenseSouth Alabama defense

Tulane gains enough yardage on pass plays for the down and distance far more often than most FBS teams, while South Alabama allows enough yardage on pass plays for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle. That comparison favors Tulane.

Passing Success Rate · 47.8%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Among the strongest FBS results
Passing Success Rate allowed · 39.7%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Near the FBS middle

Comparison basis · Passing success rate vs passing success rate allowed

Tulane finishing drives

EDGE
Tulane offenseSouth Alabama defense

Tulane scores points after possessions cross the opponent's 40-yard line at a rate near the FBS middle, while South Alabama allows points after possessions cross the opponent's 40-yard line far more often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Tulane.

Points per scoring opportunity · 3.88 pointsFinishing drives measures points per possession that reaches the opponent's 40-yard line.Near the FBS middle
Points allowed per scoring opportunity · 4.35 pointsFinishing drives measures points allowed per possession that reaches the defense's 40-yard line.Among the weakest FBS results

Comparison basis · Points per scoring opportunity, for and allowed

Season aggregates only. How a specific opponent forces field position and drive length is not captured here.

Staying on schedule

NO EDGE
South Alabama offenseTulane defense

South Alabama gains enough yardage for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle, while Tulane allows enough yardage for the down and distance more often than most FBS teams. The evidence does not separate the teams enough for an advantage here.

Offensive Success Rate · 41.8%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Near the FBS middle
Defensive Success Rate allowed · 44.6%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Worse than most FBS teams

Comparison basis · Success rate vs success rate allowed

Explore

Go deeper

Team reads

Position rooms

South Alabama position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Tulane position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Coverage and limitations
  • Forecasts are produced only when both teams meet SharpTake's evidence requirements.
  • Player availability, injuries, weather, travel, and rest are not included.
  • Explain factors use completed 2025 team-season evidence. They describe matchup contrasts and are not causal model attribution.

Forecasts are model-based context, not guarantees.

Forecast model · Data cutoff Sep. 12, 2026 · 7:00 PM ET

← Back to forecast board Recent results