Control basic Google Analytics for this browser. Analytics is on by default for eligible U.S. visits; elsewhere, it needs your permission. Sports questions are not sent to Google Analytics. Privacy policy
SharpTake projected Miami (OH) at 79%. Miami (OH) won.
ProjectedMiami (OH) by 12.5
ActualMiami (OH) by 20
Difference7.5 pts
Market spreadMiami (OH) -9.5
Vs spreadWINSharpTake Pick: Miami (OH) -9.5
Pregame forecast · published before kickoff and not revised
Akron 21%Miami (OH) 79%
SharpTake projects Miami (OH) to win.
Miami (OH)Projected winner
79%Win probability
Miami (OH) by 12.5Projected margin
On-field context
Matchup breakdown
These matchup factors describe where the teams differ on the field. They are separate from SharpTake's forecast explanation above.
Miami (OH) disruption vs Akron
EDGE
Akron disruption allowedMiami (OH) disruption created
Akron avoids tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles less often than most FBS teams, while Miami (OH) creates tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles more often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Miami (OH).
Havoc Rate allowed · 17.9%Havoc Rate is the share of plays with a tackle for loss, pass defended, or forced fumble.Worse than most FBS teams
Defensive Havoc Rate · 17.8%Havoc Rate is the share of plays with a tackle for loss, pass defended, or forced fumble.Better than most FBS teams
Comparison basis · Havoc allowed vs havoc created
Staying on schedule
NO EDGE
Miami (OH) offenseAkron defense
Miami (OH) gains enough yardage for the down and distance less often than most FBS teams, while Akron allows enough yardage for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle. The evidence does not separate the teams enough for an advantage here.
Offensive Success Rate · 39.4%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Worse than most FBS teams
Defensive Success Rate allowed · 40.3%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Near the FBS middle
Comparison basis · Success rate vs success rate allowed
Run game
NO EDGE
Akron offenseMiami (OH) defense
Akron gains enough yardage on runs for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle, while Miami (OH) allows enough yardage on runs for the down and distance less often than most FBS teams. The evidence does not separate the teams enough for an advantage here.
Rushing Success Rate · 42.2%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Near the FBS middle
Rushing Success Rate allowed · 38.9%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Better than most FBS teams
Akron position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.Miami (OH) position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Coverage and limitations
Forecasts are produced only when both teams meet SharpTake's evidence requirements.
Player availability, injuries, weather, travel, and rest are not included.
Explain factors use completed 2025 team-season evidence. They describe matchup contrasts and are not causal model attribution.
Forecasts are model-based context, not guarantees.
Forecast model · Data cutoff Oct. 17, 2026 · 1:32 AM ET