FINAL Game forecast · REGULAR week 6
South AlabamaatArkansas State
SharpTake projected Arkansas State at 57%. South Alabama won.
Pregame forecast · published before kickoff and not revised
SharpTake projects Arkansas State to win.
Why SharpTake leans
Why SharpTake leans Arkansas State
Arkansas State's current season's results is the biggest reason SharpTake favors Arkansas State. Arkansas State also has the edge in down-to-down efficiency, while South Alabama's record from last season pushes the other way.
Overall team quality
Current season's results
Down-to-down efficiency
On-field context
Matchup breakdown
These matchup factors describe where the teams differ on the field. They are separate from SharpTake's forecast explanation above.
Arkansas State explosive plays
EDGEArkansas State creates big-play value on successful plays far less often than most FBS teams, while South Alabama allows big-play value on successful plays at a rate near the FBS middle. That comparison favors South Alabama.
Comparison basis · Explosiveness vs explosiveness allowed
Pass game
NO EDGESouth Alabama gains enough yardage on pass plays for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle, while Arkansas State allows enough yardage on pass plays for the down and distance more often than most FBS teams. The evidence does not separate the teams enough for an advantage here.
Comparison basis · Passing success rate vs passing success rate allowed
Disruption
NO EDGESouth Alabama avoids tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles more often than most FBS teams, while Arkansas State creates tackles for loss, passes defensed, and forced fumbles at a rate near the FBS middle. The evidence does not separate the teams enough for an advantage here.
Comparison basis · Havoc allowed vs havoc created
Explore
Go deeper
Team reads
Position rooms
Coverage and limitations
- Forecasts are produced only when both teams meet SharpTake's evidence requirements.
- Player availability, injuries, weather, travel, and rest are not included.
- Explain factors use completed 2025 team-season evidence. They describe matchup contrasts and are not causal model attribution.
Forecasts are model-based context, not guarantees.