FINAL Game forecast · REGULAR week 6
James MadisonatGeorgia Southern
SharpTake projected James Madison at 86%. James Madison won.
Pregame forecast · published before kickoff and not revised
SharpTake projects James Madison to win.
Why SharpTake leans
Why SharpTake leans James Madison
James Madison's overall quality is the biggest reason SharpTake favors James Madison. James Madison also has the edge in down-to-down efficiency, while Georgia Southern's current season's results pushes the other way.
Down-to-down efficiency
Current season's results
Last season's results
On-field context
Matchup breakdown
These matchup factors describe where the teams differ on the field. They are separate from SharpTake's forecast explanation above.
James Madison run game
CLEAR EDGEJames Madison gains enough yardage on runs for the down and distance more often than most FBS teams, while Georgia Southern allows enough yardage on runs for the down and distance far more often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors James Madison.
Comparison basis · Rushing success rate vs rushing success rate allowed
James Madison staying on schedule
EDGEJames Madison gains enough yardage for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle, while Georgia Southern allows enough yardage for the down and distance far more often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors James Madison.
Comparison basis · Success rate vs success rate allowed
James Madison pass game
EDGEJames Madison gains enough yardage on pass plays for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle, while Georgia Southern allows enough yardage on pass plays for the down and distance far more often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors James Madison.
Comparison basis · Passing success rate vs passing success rate allowed
Explore
Go deeper
Team reads
Position rooms
Coverage and limitations
- Forecasts are produced only when both teams meet SharpTake's evidence requirements.
- Player availability, injuries, weather, travel, and rest are not included.
- Explain factors use completed 2025 team-season evidence. They describe matchup contrasts and are not causal model attribution.
Forecasts are model-based context, not guarantees.