FINAL Game forecast · REGULAR week 1

Sam HoustonatTroy

Sat, Sep. 5 · 7:00 PM ET · Veterans Memorial Stadium (AL)

Sam Houston21
Troy24
CALLED

SharpTake projected Troy at 85%. Troy won.

ProjectedTroy by 17.0
ActualTroy by 3
Difference14.0 pts
Market spreadTroy -16.5
Vs spreadLOSSSharpTake Pick: Troy -16.5

Pregame forecast · published before kickoff and not revised

SharpTake projects Troy to win.

TroyProjected winner
85%Win probability
Troy by 17.0Projected margin

Why SharpTake leans

Why SharpTake leans Troy

Troy's overall quality is the biggest reason SharpTake favors Troy. Troy also has the edge in down-to-down efficiency, while Sam Houston's record from last season pushes the other way.

Overall team quality

Strong Troy advantage

Down-to-down efficiency

Troy advantage

Last season's results

Sam Houston offset

Passing efficiency

Sam Houston offset

On-field context

Matchup breakdown

These matchup factors describe where the teams differ on the field. They are separate from SharpTake's forecast explanation above.

Sam Houston finishing drives

CLEAR EDGE
Sam Houston offenseTroy defense

Sam Houston scores points after possessions cross the opponent's 40-yard line far less often than most FBS teams, while Troy allows points after possessions cross the opponent's 40-yard line less often than most FBS teams. That comparison favors Troy.

Points per scoring opportunity · 2.79 pointsFinishing drives measures points per possession that reaches the opponent's 40-yard line.Among the weakest FBS results
Points allowed per scoring opportunity · 3.17 pointsFinishing drives measures points allowed per possession that reaches the defense's 40-yard line.Better than most FBS teams

Comparison basis · Points per scoring opportunity, for and allowed

Season aggregates only. How a specific opponent forces field position and drive length is not captured here.

Sam Houston staying on schedule

EDGE
Sam Houston offenseTroy defense

Sam Houston gains enough yardage for the down and distance far less often than most FBS teams, while Troy allows enough yardage for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle. That comparison favors Troy.

Offensive Success Rate · 36.3%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Among the weakest FBS results
Defensive Success Rate allowed · 39.6%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Near the FBS middle

Comparison basis · Success rate vs success rate allowed

Sam Houston pass game

EDGE
Sam Houston offenseTroy defense

Sam Houston gains enough yardage on pass plays for the down and distance far less often than most FBS teams, while Troy allows enough yardage on pass plays for the down and distance at a rate near the FBS middle. That comparison favors Troy.

Passing Success Rate · 33.9%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Among the weakest FBS results
Passing Success Rate allowed · 38.6%Success Rate is the share of plays that gain enough yardage for the down and distance.Near the FBS middle

Comparison basis · Passing success rate vs passing success rate allowed

Explore

Go deeper

Team reads

Position rooms

Sam Houston position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Troy position roomsWho is on the 2026 roster and what they did in 2025; navigation, not forecast factors.
Coverage and limitations
  • Forecasts are produced only when both teams meet SharpTake's evidence requirements.
  • Player availability, injuries, weather, travel, and rest are not included.
  • Explain factors use completed 2025 team-season evidence. They describe matchup contrasts and are not causal model attribution.
  • Neither team has completed a game this season; the forecast rests on prior-season evidence.

Forecasts are model-based context, not guarantees.

Forecast model · Data cutoff Sep. 5, 2026 · 7:00 PM ET

← Back to forecast board Recent results